Mandatory selection criteria

Cross-border cooperation

0 – The cross-border cooperation has a weak connection to the achievement of the project results. The project could have been implemented with national funding.

1 – The cross-border cooperation is connected to the achievement of the project results and adds value to the implementation of the project.

2 – The cross-border cooperation is strongly connected to the achievement of the proposed project results and adds significant value to the implementation of the project.

Specific objective

0 – The project makes a week contribution to fulfilling one specific objective of the programme.

1 – The project contributes to fulfilling one specific objective of the programme.

2 – The project makes a strong contribution to fulfilling one specific objective of the programme.

Sustainable development

0 – The partnership is not including the three dimensions of sustainable development in the project.

1 – The partnership is including the three dimensions of sustainable development in the project.

2 – The partnership is using sustainable development as a driving force in the project.

The partnership

0 – The partnership does not have the capacity to achieve and implement the project results.

1 – The partnership has the capacity to achieve and implement the project results.

2 – The partnership has significant capacity to achieve and implement the project results.

Logical

0 – The proposed project plan is not logical and realistic.

1 – The proposed project plan is logical and realistic.

2 – The proposed project plan is logical and realistic, and all parts of the project are well connected.

Relevance to target group

0 – The result of the project is not based on needs of a target group.

1 – The result of the project is based on needs of a target group.

2 – The project idea is initiated by the target group and the expected result of the project is based on needs of the target group.

Value-for-money

0 – The value of the proposed project results is disproportionate to the level of funding requested.

1 – The value of the proposed project results is proportional to the level of funding requested.

2 – The value of the proposed project results exceeds the level of funding requested.